| |
Project
Description
Page 1 of 2
The following information is from the grant proposal
submitted by Seminole County Public Schools to the Florida DOE
for the EETT2 grant. Use the links to access a section quickly.
Overview
| Goal | Objectives
| Vision | Project Design
|
| Project Staff and Management | Coaches
| Anticipated Outcomes
Infusion of Technology | Professional
Development | Parental Support
(Go to page 2 of
Project Description for:
Charter Schools | Research | Data Collection | Replication
| Proposed Partners | Support for Strategic Imperatives | Dissemination
and Marketing | Evaluation | Case Study Model)
Overview of Project

The proposed project is designed to:
• Expand and enhance the integration of technology in the
math and science classrooms through the use of laptop computers
and supporting technology devices
• Empower teachers through extensive professional development
in content areas, technology, and the creation of math/science classroom
environments for authentic learning
• Motivate middle school students to improve academic performance
by engaging them in relevant, authentic learning
• Provide interdisciplinary learning experiences
• Make learning relevant and useful to students by establishing
connections to community and the work place
• Expand and enhance technology skills of administrators,
coaches, teachers, students and parents through ongoing training
• Establish a collaborative relationship between teachers
and students
• Enhance the collegial relationships among math and science
teachers within a school and from school-to-school
• Expand and enhance the project-related knowledge and skills
of administrators to assure project accountability
(Back to Top)
The goal of the project is:
To engage teachers and students in a REAL learning environment that
is designed to increase student achievement through the integration
of laptop computers as a tool for teaching and learning in the classroom.
(Back to Top)
Project Objectives:
Objective 1: To increase the number of targeted students who make
annual learning gains in mathematics and science by two percent
as measured by FCAT
Objective 2: By June 2007, to maximize professional development
opportunities for 100% of mathematics and science teachers at the
target schools through the use of coaches
Objective 3: By April 2007, to train a minimum of 100 middle school
math and science teachers in strategies and methodologies that correlate
project based learning and technology integration to teaching higher
order thinking skills
Objective 4: By October 2006, to involve the targeted teachers and
students in global learning communities by establishing partnerships
with a minimum of six community businesses, agencies and institutes
of higher education
Objective 5: To ensure the technology literacy of 90% of the targeted
teachers and eighth grade students as measured by the Inventory
of Teacher Technology Skills and Student Tools for Technology Literacy
Objective 6: Design and implement a case study research-based evaluation
model
Objective 7: Increase the technology literacy of 50% of parents/guardians
of targeted students
(Back to Top)
Vision for the Project:
Imagine a middle school classroom where students have been invited
to work with community partners to investigate real issues that
concern them, their community and their world and they are being
encouraged to make contributions that may lead to solutions. This
classroom would be exciting, engaging, and learning-centered. The
teacher would be well trained in Project Based Learning, would be
comfortable with the use of technology as a teaching tool, and would
be connected to peers and others in the community who could enhance
the teaching and learning that was taking place. Does this sound
like Utopia? Or a classroom that could be found in every school
across the state? Middle Schools Get REAL is a pilot project that
could make this utopian vision a possibility. It is built on research-based
pedagogy that supports increased student performance; increased
teacher use of technology in the classroom as a tool for interdisciplinary
learning; and increased civic involvement of schools with their
community.
(Back to Top)
Project Design:
Middle Schools Get REAL is a project that is designed to pilot the
use of laptop computers and supporting technology devices in the
classroom. The project targets middle school mathematics and science
teachers and students in grades 6, 7 and 8. Three middle schools
and the middle school grades at one charter school have been selected
for participation in the pilot project. The project is designed
to help students improve higher order thinking skills, see real
world relevancy in mathematics and science, and use technology as
a tool to enhance learning. The strong point of the project is intensive,
ongoing teacher training that engages teachers in research based
strategies and methodology. Teachers will be empowered to explore
their full potential as teachers and will be encouraged to bring
a new experience of learning to their students. Assisted by the
science and mathematics coaches, mathematics and science teachers
will co-create interdisciplinary learning for their students that
is relevant, engaging and authentic.
Engaging middle school students in authentic learning in the content
areas of mathematics and science is a challenge for any classroom
teacher, however, the proposed project will demonstrate how to successfully
accomplish this in ways that enhance the teaching process, increase
student achievement, promote the use of technology, and increase
the technology literacy levels of all participants.
Project Based Learning and Understanding by Design will be used
as the framework for using technology tools in the classroom. These
important strategies support teachers as learning facilitators and
empower students to make decisions about how they will find answers
and solve problems, consequently improving higher order thinking
skills.
Project partners will be invited to work with the Project Support
Team to develop a menu of community issues that schools will use
to determine the focus and extent of their projects. Each school
will elect to work with the partners that are most closely linked
to the projects that have been selected. The projects may include,
but will not be limited to issues that are pertinent to the environment,
urban planning, and/or biotechnology. Once the issues have been
selected, then the lead teachers and administrators will meet with
the partners and the Project Support Team to determine the scope
and sequence of the projects; links to curriculum benchmarks; teacher
mentors; and the security safeguards that will be in place for communication
between students and the partner’s employees.
Teachers and students will initiate the projects by determining
the essential questions and designing the parameters for each project.
Students will be expected to work in small groups to do research,
communicate with their partners, collect information and data, prepare
multimedia presentations, and design and publish project specific
web sites.
Internet resources and digital content will be utilized to develop
solutions and provide depth to web sites and project presentations.
An integrated mathematics and science curriculum, aligned to standards
and benchmarks, will enable students to learn basic skills within
the context of the real world issues that they are working to solve.
Teachers will use mobile laptop labs (including software and tools
such as LCD projectors, science probes, and cameras) to maximize
learning in the classroom. Each grade level at the three pilot middle
schools will have access to two mobile labs. The charter school,
because of limited student enrollment, will be provided laptops
for participating teacher use and one mobile lab. The mobile labs
and the tool-based software will provide access to the world beyond
the classroom, will invite students to integrate subject area content
and the production process, and will emphasize learning as a life-long
activity.
(Back to Top)
Project Staff and Management:
The project is a collaborative effort of district level staff and
school staff with clearly defined roles and responsibilities (See
Chart A, p. 16).
Dr. Ann Kohler, Manager, Technology Implementation, will act as
the project manager and will oversee all project activities. Dr.
Kohler is fully credentialed and has served the district as teacher
and instructional technology administrator for more than twenty-five
years. She will coordinate all project activities with the district
and school administrators, trainers, partners, and coaches. She
will act as chairman of the district’s Project Support Team
whose membership includes the following:
Dr. Kohler, Chair
Dr. Anna-Marie Cote, Executive Director, Instructional Excellence
& Equity
Dr. Ron Pinnell, Executive Director, Middle School Education
John Tracy, CIO
Hugh Harris, Director, Curriculum
Dr. Sallie Jenkins, Director, Professional Development
Dr. Sharon Shrader, Secondary Mathematics Curriculum Specialist
Donna Poniatowski, Secondary Science Curriculum Specialist
Diane Lewis, Instructional Technology Curriculum Specialist
Kathy Rhodus, Professional Development Educational Technology Specialists
Claire Robinson, Information Services Instructional Support
Jeanne Farmer, Coordinator, Resource Development
Elayne Reiss, Manager, Performance Data
Melanie Howard-Miller, Middle School Mathematics Coach
Jenifer Rembert, Middle School Science Coach
TBD, Master Teachers
Each school will establish a REAL Team whose membership will include:
School Administrator
Education Technology Facilitator
Media Specialists
Lead Teacher from each Grade Level
Middle School Mathematics Coach
Middle School Science Coach
(Back to Top)
Coaches:
As part of the project design, two middle school coaches will be
hired to jointly serve the project schools. One coach will have
expertise in mathematics and one in science (see job description
Appendices). The coaches will attend extensive training on the hardware
and software to be used in this project; the framework models (PBL
and UbD); technology integration; and the coaching model. The coaches,
following a model for instructional coaches developed by the district,
will be responsible for improving classroom instruction that results
in higher student achievement by:
- Linking teacher efficacy and increased student performance
- Impacting teacher thinking and delivery of instruction
- Expanding the assessment and instructional processes needed
in the classroom to ensure that the needs of all students are
identified and addressed
- Enhancing the school culture through improved communication
and collaboration
- Integrating technology into classroom lesson designs
- Benefiting teachers professionally
| Coaching
Expectations |
Measurable
Indicators of Success |
1. Student achievement
2. Teacher effectiveness
|
1. Show increase in number of students at level 3 and above
on the FCAT Math and Science
2. Teacher participation in professional development activities
3. Teacher use of effective strategies and methodologies in
the classroom
|
Research conducted by the Puget Sound Center for Teaching, Learning
and Technology in Bothell, Washington, suggests that the outcomes
of coaching in a technology-rich environment include an increase
in the teachers comfort level when using technology in the classroom;
improvement in understanding and awareness of how technology can
be used to increase student learning; increase in team teaching;
and increase in the teachers knowledge of resources available for
use in the classroom.
The coaching schedule will include the following:
| Monday
(School A) |
Tuesday
(School B) |
Wednesday |
Thursday
(School C) |
Friday
(Charter School) |
Pre conferences with teachers
Classroom observations
Post conferences with teachers
One-on-one coaching
|
Pre conferences with teachers
Classroom observations
Post conferences with teachers
One-on-one coaching
|
Joint planning
Meetings with district staff
Participation in training & Action Research
Conduct early release day – group training
|
Pre conferences with teachers
Classroom observations
Post conferences with teachers
One-on-one coaching
|
Morning
Pre conferences with teachers
Classroom observations
Post conferences with teachers
One-on-one coaching Afternoon
Coaches debriefing time
Meet with school administrators once a month to discuss project
progress
|
(Back to Top)
Anticipated Outcomes:
As a result of the proposed project, teachers will be more proficient
in the use of technology and their training will be immediate and
ongoing; students will increase academic performance in mathematics
and science and will gain skills in the use of technology. The major
components and anticipated outcomes of the project are:
| Component |
Outcomes |
| Teacher training |
1. Coaches will be available for on-site training and classroom
demonstrations
2. Teachers will feel supported in their efforts to incorporate
new pedagogy and technology use into the math and science curriculum
3. Teachers will gain knowledge and skills that enable them
to make learning more relevant, engaging and authentic
4. Train the trainer model will be incorporated to ensure that
the pilot project is replicated
5. Face-to-face and online training modules will be developed
and implemented
|
| Cross-curricular collaboration |
1. Middle school math and science teachers will work collaboratively
on projects that help students make important correlations between
the disciplines
2. Curriculum modules will be developed
3. Curriculum will be more realistically aligned to benchmarks
4. Scaffolding of lessons will better prepare students for the
academic knowledge that is expected of them on standardized
tests
|
| Project Based Learning |
1. Classrooms will become global learning communities where
business, community members and parents are engaged in the education
process
2. Teachers become facilitators of the learning process
3. Students improve higher order thinking and self-management
skills
|
| Real world connections |
1. Web-based educational site will be developed and utilized
by teachers, students, and parents
2. Teachers and students will have the tools and skills to collect
and analyze “real time” data
3. Business and higher education partners will be engaged in
the learning process of the students
4. Mentors will be involved in co-creating the learning environment
with the teachers
5. Authentic learning will take place in the classroom as students
engage in problem solving that has real world relevancy
6. Parents will be involved with their students in project based
learning experiences
|
| Technology integration |
1. Technology tools will come out of the packing boxes and
be utilized in the classroom, not sit on the shelf until “someday”
2. Teachers and students will expand and enhance their knowledge
and skills through the use of tool based software
3. Science and mathematics curriculum will be interrelated and
infused with technology
4. Technical writing skills will be infused across the curriculum
and skills with be increased
|
| Maximization of laptops and supporting devices |
1. Teacher laptops will offer teachers full time access to
resources and tools that may be used in planning and implementing
lessons
2. Mobile laptop labs will offer students access to resources
and tools that may be used to enhance the learning experience
3. Technology availability will be maximized at the pilot schools
4. Parents will have an opportunity to increase knowledge and
skills through training and the checkout system for home use
of refurbished laptops
5. Students will develop, create, and manage project specific
web sites
|
| Case Study Model |
1. Criteria for determining the effective use of technology
will be developed and used
2. Data will be collected and analyzed to determine the strengths
and weaknesses of the project and its impact on teacher effectiveness,
student achievement, and community participation
3. Data and findings will be forwarded to the Research Oversight
Committee
|
The project’s strategies and methodologies are designed to
provide a framework for learning that ensures that the outcomes
are realistic and attainable.
As the project unfolds, the pilot will ensure that a process is
developed and modeled that can be replicated across the district.
Implementation of the coaching model, the online training components,
and the resources posted on the web site will make it easier for
the middle schools not included in the project to begin implementation
of many of the core components.
(Back to Top)
Infusion of Technology
Although laptops will be available to the teachers and students
in the pilot project, training is the most important factor of this
project:
- The project manager, the math and science coaches, and lead
teachers will attend the state sponsored summer training institute
- The math and science coaches will attend extensive training
in all aspects of the project to ensure that they are well versed
in the use of the technology and the strategies and methodologies
for infusing the technology into the classroom. They will attend
training on Project Based Learning, Understanding by Design, and
multimedia presentations
- Teachers and students will participate in extensive training
that will enable laptops to become a viable part of the teaching
and learning process.
Teacher Empowerment – Teaches will
be provided the hardware and software that is essential to the project’s
success. The software will include but not be limited to Inspiration,
Adobe Premiere Elements 2, Photoshop Elements 4, Microsoft Suite
including Word and Excel, Blackboard and School Center. Teachers
will attend district sponsored summer institutes and on-going training
that will better prepare them to understand the functionality of
the computers and supporting devices provided through the project
and the “tool-based” software that will be made available
for classroom use. The math and science coaches, curriculum specialists,
and professional development technology trainers will work closely
with teachers to enable them to capitalize on the full capability
of the software.
Student Empowerment - Each school will
select a community issue and will work with a business/community
partner to research, gather data, and hypothesize possible solutions
to the issue. The project manager and project support team will
meet with the partnering agencies to determine a menu of options
for the schools. The menu will be presented to the school team during
pre-planning. At this point, the math and science teachers, along
with their students will review the suggested list of partners and
community issues and will select one that most closely matches their
interests. From the general list of issues, essential questions
will be determined and the project based learning process will be
initiated. Students will receive instruction in the use of the tool-based
software and will work individually and in teams to investigate
their issue. Through distance learning connections to their partner
and other like entities, they will gather information, collect pertinent
data, and will make decisions about how to find answers and solve
problems. The laptop mobile labs will be shared among the grade
levels and students will have weekly access to the tools they will
need to develop, manage, and communicate their projects. Each student
will describe, assess and plan for multimedia presentations throughout
the project period, which they will use to present their solutions
to their peers and the partners. This component maximizes the integration
of technology with the subject curriculum and authenticates the
learning process.
Laptops will be used to:
1) connect students to business and community for the purpose of
data collection, analysis, reporting
2) improve technical writing skills
3) increase technology literacy
4) develop presentation skills
5) develop video editing skills
The academic emphasis for the project is integration of math, science
and writing through the use of technology. Using laptop computers
and supporting devices such as probes, cameras, and microscopes,
students will focus on community issues in a project based learning
environment. The participating math and science teachers will co-create
an integrated curriculum that focuses on solving real world issues.
The teachers will work with project partners to select community
issues (solving real world problems) such as the environment (water
and air quality), urban planning (new development, traffic control),
the Wekiva River, and/or biotechnology (medical and horticultural
issues) for each school that will give students myriad options for
investigation, data gathering, research and information sharing.
Strong partnerships with business and community agencies will be
cultivated to ensure that students and teachers have every opportunity
to expand and enhance the project’s potential. These may include
but not be limited to Lockheed Martin, Central Florida Zoo, Orlando
Science Center, St. Johns Water Management District, Department
of Transportation, Seminole County Government, and South Seminole
Regional Hospital. In addition, there will be collaborative tie-ins
to projects currently being implemented in the district that impact
math and science such as Gator TRAX, SECME, and the Texas Instrument
Project.
Students will use the laptops to connect to their business and
community partners for the purpose of data collection, data analysis,
and reporting. This communication will form the basis for understanding
the issues that need to be resolved. Students will use a teacher
supervised and managed email system, like gaggle.net for communication
with others.
Students will use the Internet resources to conduct research and
to connect to other agencies with like-issues.
The tool-based software selected for the project will enable the
students to prepare multimedia presentations, reports, and documentation
of project progress. This process will introduce and/or reinforce
mathematic and science skills, and will enable students to improve
technical writing skills. Students will learn new skills, which
include video editing, storyboarding, web creation, and multimedia
documentation.
The mobile laptop labs will include probes, microscopes, printers,
and a variety of cameras that students will utilize in their investigations
and research. Valuable skills will be learned and practiced as students
become familiar with these tools and their functions.
Project Based Learning enables students to be engaged in relevant
and authentic tasks as a result of connections that are established
to the world beyond the classroom. As the students address real
world concerns they will use the Internet resources and digital
content that will be available in the classroom: 1) Students will
make real world connections with businesses, agencies and institutes
of higher education, 2) Students will use the Internet for research
and data gathering, and 3) Students will be able to use digital
content such as video and audio clips to enlarge the scope of their
reports and multimedia presentations.
A variety of supporting devices will be included on the laptop
mobile labs: 1) laptop computers, 2) printers, 3) probes, 4) LCD
projectors, 5) video and still digital cameras, 6) document cameras,
7) microscopes, and 8) TI 84 calculators
Additional technologies will be used to motivate students to develop
a global learning community. The teachers and project partners will
assist students in designing a network for distance learning that
includes connections to real professionals and resources. Students
will use authentic methods, practices, and tools to reach authentic
audiences through meaningful tasks and learning experiences. Students
will learn collaborative skills as they are involved in group decision-making,
communication with and feedback from researchers and other students,
and facilitation by their teachers. The technology will prompt students
to take the initiative in solving complex problems. Each student
will participate in the creation and development of project specific
web sites, podcasts, technical papers, graphical displays of data,
and multimedia presentations.
(Back to Top)
Professional Development (more
on this topic can be found in the Calendar
section of this website)
Two content area coaches – one math and one science - will
be hired to provide teacher training and on-going support. The coaches
will work with the project manager, district curriculum and professional
development specialists, and teachers to develop vertical and horizontal
articulation. The vertical articulation will be centered on relating
content across grade levels and correlating classroom strategies
to the benchmarks and standards. The horizontal articulation will
focus on integration of math and science content and the use of
technology as a tool for enhancing learning. The following training
is core to the project:
Technical Training –
- Use of hardware, including laptops, probes, LCD projectors,
microscopes
- Use of software, including Word, Excel, Inspiration, Adobe
Premier Elements 2, Photoshop Elements 4
- Strategies for maximizing the use of Internet and digital resources
in the classroom
Pedagogical Support –
- Project Based Learning
- Understanding by Design
- Cross-curricular math and science content that meets benchmarks
and standards
- Strategies for technology integration
- Higher Order Thinking Skills
Classroom Management –
- Cooperative Learning
- Classroom environments that support Project Based Learning
To build capacity for the project and ensure that there is constancy
and consistency of delivery once the funds have terminated, the
district will utilize the skills of master teachers as trainers.
Two teachers who demonstrate expertise in their field, utilize project
based learning methodologies, and implement the Understanding by
Design strategies, Trent Daniel (Science Department Chair, Hagerty
High) and Dr. Michelle Stephens, Chiles Middle School math teacher)
will be included as members of the Project Support Team and will
assist in the development of professional development activities
for school based trainers of teachers.
Professional Development will be provided to the participating
teachers in strategies and methodologies currently being utilized
in other projects in the district, including the Texas Instrument
project, SECME, and the Gator TRAX project. These initiatives support
math and science at the secondary level.
(Back to Top)
Parental Support
The district’s information technology magnet school provides
laptop computers for all teachers and students and with every graduating
class there are a number of laptop computers that are not placed
back into the school for use. These computers will be refurbished
by the district IS department and offered to the project for use
with parents. The parents of participating students will be given
opportunities to attend a number of workshops that will be offered
throughout the year where they will become actively engaged in project
based learning with their child. The parent/child team will select
a project that is complementary to the school project and will be
invited to work on this project together as an extension of the
classroom learning experience. Upon completion of the initial training
workshop, parents will be eligible to checkout the refurbished laptops
for use at home. The length of checkout time will depend on the
number of available computers and the number of requests. The minimum
time will be six-weeks.
Parent training sessions will encourage parents to improve their
own knowledge and skills and will help close the gap between student
homes where technology access is readily available and student homes
where technology is an unaffordable luxury.
(Back to Top)
Charter Schools
The math and science teachers at Rays of Hope Charter School will
be invited to attend all project training sessions and will be provided
the equipment and software essential to the success of the project.
The coaches will include the school in their weekly coaching activities.
The school principal will determine the extent to which the project
is implemented at the school and will select a representative for
the Project Support Team.
(Back to Top)
Research
Current research supports the implementation of the methodology
selected as the framework for the proposed project. To ensure that
all aspects of the project are consistent with scientifically based
research, the project manager will work with the research team from
the University of Central Florida to review and evaluate all project
components. Research documentation will be included in the end-of-project
report.
| Program |
Research |
| Understanding by Design |
The Understanding by Design framework is guided by research
from cognitive
Psychology: Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2002
|
| Project Based Learning |
John R. Mergendoller, Ph.D. and John W. Thomas, Ph.D.
Janet D. Ward and Cheryl L. Lee, Journal of Family and Consumer
Sciences Education, Vol. 20, No. 1, Spring/Summer, 2002
|
| Coaching |
Cognitive Coaching, Costa and Garmston; Teaching & Coaching
Initiative, Puget Sound Center for Teaching, Learning &
Technology, Bothell, Washington |
(Back to Top)
Data Collection
The math and science coaches will collect data that is pertinent
to the project and submit it to the project manager. The project
manager will meet with the UCF research team to review the data
prior to submission to the Research Oversight Committee. The data
will include but not be limited to:
• Pre- and post-tests that will be included in all training
components
• 8th Grade Student Tools for Technology Literacy Inventory
• Inventory of Teacher Technology Skills
• FCAT Math, Science and Writing scores
• Nine-weeks report card grades in math and science
(Back to Top)
Replication
The pilot project establishes parameters for replication and expansion
of the project beyond the project period:
• Equipment purchased for the project will be placed on the
district technology list of equipment that is recommended for all
middle schools
• Train the trainer model will enable other teachers to be
trained in the projects strategies and methodologies
• Math and science coaches will expand training opportunities
to additional schools
(Back to Top)
Proposed Partners (more
information on partners will be supplied in the Partnership
section of this website as projects are designed)
| Proposed
Partner |
Role and
Responsibilities |
| University of Central Florida |
Project evaluation and consultation; participation in distance
learning component |
| Orlando Science Center |
Project evaluation and consultation; participation in distance
learning component |
| Central Florida Zoo |
Project evaluation and consultation; participation in distance
learning component |
| Lockheed Martin |
Project evaluation and consultation; participation in distance
learning component |
| St. Johns Water Management |
Project evaluation and consultation; participation in distance
learning component |
| Department of Transportation |
Project evaluation and consultation; participation in distance
learning component |
| Seminole County Government |
Project evaluation and consultation; participation in distance
learning component |
| South Seminole Regional Hospital |
Project evaluation and consultation; participation in distance
learning component |
(Back to Top)
Support for Strategic Imperatives
The proposed project supports the Florida State Board of Education
Strategic Imperatives 1 and 3.
Strategic Imperative 1: Increase the supply of highly effective
teachers – Ultimate Goal: A highly effective teacher leads
every public school classroom.
Strategic Imperative 3: Improve student rates of learning –
Ultimate Goal: Every student is proficient (on grade level) in reading,
writing, and mathematics.
Strategic Imperative 1: The core of the project is teacher training
and increased teacher effectiveness in the mathematics and science
classrooms.
Strategic Imperative 3: The Comprehensive K-12 Reading Plan, approved
by Just Read Florida! guides schools in meeting the standards for
reading initiated through the Florida Department of Education and
the No Child Left Behind Act. The Plan includes the following guidelines:
• Provide a highly prescriptive, daily reading framework in
each elementary and secondary school that is scientifically based
on reading research.
• Designate staff to support reading initiatives (reading
teachers, reading coaches and reading intervention specialists).
• Provide each school with uniform screening, diagnostic,
and progress monitoring assessments.
• Provide initial instruction in reading, and based upon the
determined need of the student, provide intensive interventions
• Offer reading related professional development on a flexible
schedule, including coursework for the reading endorsement.
• Provide age-appropriate, leveled reading materials for secondary
students.
• Ensure school media centers support reading initiatives.
The district has also adopted a Mathematics Framework that encourages
the integration of reading and writing into the math curriculum.
The framework was designed to significantly increase the success
rates of students as evidenced by student performance indicators
that include FCAT Mathematics proficiency levels. Objectives that
support the reading initiative include:
• Exploring an interdisciplinary approach by utilizing appropriate
reading strategies in the teaching of mathematics
• Emphasizing vocabulary building, problem solving, and critical
thinking skills
(Back to Top)
Dissemination / Marketing
The district office makes every effort to share the project outcomes
with school personnel, parents, and community members, and with
other districts. The district uses the most cost effective and creative
means – the Internet – to disseminate and market information
to ensure that program awareness is maximized. In addition, to ensure
that information is disseminated in a manner that meets the needs
of all stakeholders, a variety of other methods are used to disseminate
information, including: School newsletters; Reports to school committees;
and Parent meetings
Each of the schools will create a web site that will be linked to
a district “project” website. The site will be updated
and maintained by the schools. The project website will also be
used for posting teacher training materials, classroom modules,
and other products as appropriate and manageable. Links to resources
used by teachers and students will be developed as manageable.
o Identify the products that will be produced and how they will
be shared with other districts. This may include professional development,
digital content for students, technical assistance, etc. in the
form of websites, documents, videos, podcasts, etc.
All products that result from the implementation of the project
will be available to other districts. The web sites will be published
in a timely manner and will be updated to reflect current project
activities. Samples of student-developed materials and presentations
will be available upon request. Interested districts will be invited
to tour the pilot sites and will be informed of pertinent professional
development activities. Online professional development activities
will be available statewide. The project manager and members of
the Project Support Team will be available to provide technical
assistance to interested districts. The technical assistance may
be face-to-face or online.
o Describe how parents will be informed about the opportunities
available to them through this project.
Parents will be informed about project opportunities in a variety
of ways, including information items in school newsletters, flyers,
and announcements made via the school’s telephone communication
system. All parent activities will be posted on the school’s
web page.
o Describe how information about your project will be shared with
any additional stakeholders in your project.
The mentoring component will be one method used to share information
with the project partners. In addition, the project manager will
send a monthly e-newsletter to the partners to ensure that they
are updated on all aspects of the project. The Project Support Team
meetings will also be a platform for providing information to all
stakeholders.
o Each project must maintain a project website that includes a copy
of the proposal. A section of the website must be devoted to ongoing
progress in meeting the proposal goals. The website shall be updated
at least once a month during the project period and the date of
the latest update shall be displayed on the site. Include the URL
at which the project website will be available. The website must
be posted within one month of notification of award. Describe your
plan to create and maintain this site.
The project manager will be responsible for maintenance of the project
website. The district site will be linked to the school web sites
and will be updated no later than the last Friday of each month.
The project manager will work closely with district and school staff
to ensure that the site is current, consistent and reflective of
all aspects of the project. Training calendars will be posted on
the site and samples of student projects will be highlighted monthly.
The site will also be used to recognize the contributions and assistance
provided to the project by the partners.
The URL is www.scps.k12.fl.us
(Back to Top)
Evaluation
Methods for evaluation include a project evaluation and a case
study model:
An evaluation team composed of selected district personnel, representative
teachers and two external evaluators, Dr. Charles Dziuban and Dr.
Patsy Moskal, from the Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness
(RITE) of the University of Central Florida (UCF) will conduct the
program impact evaluation. On a quarterly basis, the project manager
will oversee and validate collection procedures prior to submission
to an evaluation team for analysis and reporting.
This evaluation design conforms to all requirements of the Government
Performance and Results Act (GPRA) and data collection elements
correspond to the program performance indicators. However, upon
request, the team will modify the components of the evaluation to
conform to the requirements of the Research Oversight Committee.
The project evaluation is based on the formative/summative model.
This model will establish monitoring throughout the entire project
period, allow for modifications and adjustments as a result of the
systematic reviews that are built into the plan, and provide not
only status information, but also reasons why objectives are or
are not being met. Due to the comprehensive nature of this project,
formative data is critical to maintaining forward momentum. The
summative data, coupled with the formative data, will provide an
understanding of the project’s success and the processes behind
that success.
A multiple methods approach will be used that allows the program
to be scrutinized from a variety of angles. The methodology is determined
by the data that needs to be collected. Observations, interviews,
surveys, questionnaires, needs assessments, and record reviews are
included. Multiple methods of data collection offer the coaches
and school decision makers’ comprehensive information about
the progress of the project at each site.
The Project Support Team will play an important role in the evaluation
process. They will develop methodologies and procedures that will
be used to evaluate school technology programs. Team observations
and a pre- and post- rubric will be used in the fall and spring
to review the school’s program and the delivery and assessment
methodologies being utilized by the instructional staff. The rubric
will include items specifically designed to assess the effectiveness
of the program to be implemented at each site. Based on the observations,
the rubric, and standardized test scores, the team will make recommendations
to the school administrative staff and the coaches on strategies
and methodologies that may be used to strengthen and enhance the
effectiveness of the program.
Included in the team’s plan are areas that will frame the
focus of the evaluation: (1) The effectiveness of the project in
preparing participating teachers to successfully implement technology
integration strategies learned through the training, (2) The effectiveness
of the project in preparing participating teachers to successfully
implement interdisciplinary strategies learned through the training,
(3) The effectiveness of the project to create staff support and
reinforcement infrastructures that promote teaching scientifically
research-based strategies, (4) The effectiveness of the project
to incorporate assessment procedures aligned with the Sunshine State
Standards and nationally recommended assessments, (5) The effectiveness
of the project to improve teachers’ knowledge, and (6) The
effectiveness of the project to raise student performance standards.
| Expectatons |
Measurable
Indicators of Success |
1. Student achievement
2. Teacher
effectiveness
|
Show increase in the number of students making annual learning
gains on FCAT Math, Science and Writing
Rubric will be used by administrators in the Fall 2006 and the
Spring 2007 to assess the effectiveness of teacher’s use
of scientifically based strategies and methodologies; a pre-post
rubric will be used to show that a minimum of seventy-five percent
of teachers are incorporating effective strategies and methodologies
and a minimum of fifty percent of teachers are showing mastery
|
Adapting the project based on evaluation
Throughout the project, information and data will be gathered on
the implementation activities including: (1) teacher attendance
at training activities, (2) the interactions that occur between
the coaches and teachers, (3) the quality of the trainings and the
participants’ perceptions of the trainings, (4) the implementation
of scientifically based research, (5) the development and validation
of the assessment process, (6) the involvement of the outside partners,
(7) the teacher’s level of implementation within the classroom,
and (8) the improvements in student math and science performance.
Administrative staff and the coaches will review this information,
as well as any other pertinent information, to refine and adapt
the model as needed.
| Objective |
Evaluation |
| Objective 1: To increase the number of targeted students who
make annual learning gains in mathematics and science by two
percent as measured by FCAT |
Math, Science and Writing FCAT 2006 will be compared to Math,
Science and Writing FCAT 2007; nine-weeks report card grades
in math & science |
| Objective 2: By June 2007, to maximize professional development
opportunities for 100% of mathematics and science teachers at
the target schools through the use of coaches |
Coaches Log and training calendars; interviews with coaches;
rubric to assess classroom practices and project implementation
by teachers; pre-and post tests |
| Objective 3: By April 2007, to train a minimum of 100 middle
school math and science teachers in strategies and methodologies
that correlate project based learning and technology integration
to teaching higher order thinking skills |
Training calendars; pre- and post-tests; classroom observations;
rubric to assess classroom practices and project implementation
by teachers; interviews with teachers |
| Objective 4: By October 2006, to involve the targeted teachers
and students in global learning communities by establishing
partnerships with a minimum of six community businesses, agencies
and institutes of higher education |
Student projects; web sites; interviews with project partners;
survey of partners, teachers and students |
| Objective 5: To ensure the technology literacy of 90% of the
targeted teachers and eighth grade students as measured by the
Inventory of Teacher Technology Skills and Student Tools for
Technology Literacy |
State developed inventories; classroom observations; survey
of teachers and eighth grade students |
| Objective 6: Design and implement a case study research-based
evaluation model |
Interviews with case study participants; completed report
by external evaluators |
| Objective 7: Increase the technology literacy of 50% of parents/guardians
of targeted students |
Pre- and post-tests; interviews with parents; survey of parents |
(Back to Top)
The Case Study Model
A Case Study model will be developed and implemented as part of
the evaluation for the proposed project. The case study will utilize
a limited sampling and will follow a rigid protocol to examine prescribed
variables. The case study involves an in-depth, longitudinal examination
of the project components as they relate to actual classroom happenings.
It will provide a systematic way of looking at the project, collecting
data, analyzing information, and reporting the results.
Dr. Dziuban and Dr. Moskal will work with the Project Support Team
to develop the parameters for the case study. The case study will
involve three teachers from each of the middle schools and one teacher
from the charter school. The teachers will be selected for participation
based on the results of the Inventory of Teacher Technology Skills.
At each site a level 1, level 2 and level 3-4 teacher will be asked
to participate in the study. Student projects/portfolios; nine-week
grades; and scores on FCAT Math, Science and Writing will be used
to measure progress toward achieving the goals and objectives set
forth in the proposal. The evaluators will develop a rubric that
will be used to assess:
- teacher attitudes regarding the effective use of laptop computers
as a tool for teaching and learning in the classroom
- teacher progress toward achieving technology literacy
- engagment of teacher and students in the project based learning
model
- teacher application of training in the classroom
- teacher attitudes regarding the use of technology in the classroom
The evaluators will conduct a minimum of two site visits to the
schools during the project period; will observe a minimum of two
training sessions; and will conduct a minimum of three interviews
with all case study participants.
o How will implementation of the project be monitored at the district,
school, and teacher level to ensure it is being implemented according
to the project goals?
The project manager will be responsible for monitoring the project
at the district level. She will coordinate the evaluation efforts
with Dr. Dziuban and Dr. Moskal and will meet with the district’s
Performance Data Manager to determine whether project components
are being implemented with fidelity. Any discrepancies or concerns
will be reviewed by the Project Support Team and discussed with
school administrators in an effort to modify and strengthen the
overall impact of the project.
The REAL Team at each school will be responsible for monitoring
the project at the school level. The team will meet monthly to review
the project and assess strengths and weaknesses of the schools implementation
plan. The school administrator will discuss any discrepancies or
concerns with the project manager.
The coaches will be responsible for monitoring the project at the
teacher level. They will meet monthly with school administrators
to discuss the project and review the project activities.
All personnel responsible for monitoring the project will use the
rubric designed by the project evaluators to ensure project constancy
and consistency.
o What data will be available to the Research Oversight Committee
and what is the timetable for supplying the data?
At a minimum, the following data will be available to the Research
Oversight Committee:
• Pre- and post-tests that will be included in all training
components
• 8th Grade Student Tools for Technology Literacy Inventory
• Inventory of Teacher Technology Skills
• FCAT Math, Science and Writing scores
• Nine-weeks report card grades in math and science
o All teachers participating in the proposed project must complete
Florida's Inventory of Teacher Technology Skills at both the beginning
and the end of the project period. Explain how this data will be
utilized.
The project will utilize the Inventory of Teacher Technology Skills
to determine the type and amount of technology training that is
required for participating teachers. This measure will also be used
to determine teacher eligibility for the case study.
(Back to Top)
|